Greetings!

Welcome to Scifi-Meshes.com! Click one of these buttons to join in on the fun.

3DKronos One

1234579

Posts

  • spacefighterspacefighter2 Posts: 0Member
    excellent the both of them, she is a real beauty.
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    New flyby coming tomorrow hopefully...this one showing off a lot more of the top. Always surprises me by what I learn when I render out these huge ships flying around!
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Another flyby animation! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzMqS5Ddoas

    Edit: reuploaded with their recommended settings, dunno if it helped.
  • wibblewibble1149 Weimar, GermanyPosts: 517Member
    WHOA! That one is realy nice.
    I like the darker tone of the images.
    Add a bit Filmgrain and it will loke like in the original movie.
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Thanks....is it just me or is the video kind of stuttery? I don't know much about uploading to youtube. I uploaded a 1080p H264 mov
  • wibblewibble1149 Weimar, GermanyPosts: 517Member
    Ha, I thought it was just me (and my lame PC) but now that you ask the same, yes it is stuttery ... ehm simple solution ... upload a lower resolution. Just a guess though, don't realy have experience with youtube as well
  • IRMLIRML253 Posts: 1,993Member
    it looks brilliant, it could pass for a physical model
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Thanks IRML, I think I might just do some stills next, although I tend to have a hard time thinking of sort of cool ways to go about it. Guess it means I need a little break this weekend
  • TralfazTralfaz412 Posts: 846Member
    Watched in HD. Looks amazing, although I did notice a bit of noise at the leading edge of the rear hull near the neck. Wonderful model.
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Tralfaz wrote: »
    Watched in HD. Looks amazing, although I did notice a bit of noise at the leading edge of the rear hull near the neck. Wonderful model.

    Yeah, got some crawlies in the specular pass I didn't quite catch. I plan on masking those out and reposting the vid at some point. Dang it!
  • spacefighterspacefighter2 Posts: 0Member
    IRML wrote: »
    it looks brilliant, it could pass for a physical model
    seems even better than a physical model.
  • TALON_UKTALON_UK2 Posts: 0Member
    Excellent work there.

    :thumb:
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Gah, double post! server so slow
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Here's a beauty shot of the Kronos...

    front_comp_02.jpg
  • spacefighterspacefighter2 Posts: 0Member
    japetus wrote: »
    Here's a beauty shot of the Kronos...

    front_comp_02.jpg

    absolutely wicked!!

    just a thought though that is a background shot from the spitzer telescope isn't it? the spitzer is infrared, i think your model is supposed to be rendered in visible light in this shot so perhaps consider a different background for this awesome model. still excellent colours, details and lighting.
  • lennier1lennier1914 Posts: 1,284Member
    Sweet!
    Do you still have an earlier state of the model to give her two regular honor guard escorts?
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    lennier1 wrote: »
    Sweet!
    Do you still have an earlier state of the model to give her two regular honor guard escorts?

    I was thinking of making a regular version, wouldn't be too bad..
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Here's another idea i was messing around with...

    bothships_test_01.jpg
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Double post galore today... :mad:
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Here's an update to the test with both ships...

    bothships_test_02.jpg
  • SaquistSaquist1 Posts: 0Member
    The glows are extremely harsh.
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    I kinda liked the dreamy effect of the last one, but here's one with glows turned down...bothships_test_03.jpg
  • spacefighterspacefighter2 Posts: 0Member
    as far as i can tell the difference in glow is minimal so both are fine but kronos 1 is somewhat out of focus in both pictures, it would look better if you were to shift the focus and make the klingon vessel clearer. "guess who's coming to dinner..."
  • ViperViper1690 Posts: 717Administrator
    These images are too small :D They look too tiny in 27" to see the details :)
  • RekkertRekkert4129 Buenos Aires, ArgentinaPosts: 2,314Member
    The last image looks absolutely fantastic! I actually like it more with the Kronos One out of focus, it kinda looks more realistic that way, in my opinion. :)
    For all my finished Trek fan art, please visit my portfolio
  • ZeropointZeropoint0 Posts: 0Member
    That looks a lot better than anything from the Abrams Trek movies!
  • Chris2005Chris2005678 Posts: 3,097Member
    Absolutely stunning.
    AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
    Gigabyte RTX 3080 Gaming OC 12GB
    1TB NVMe SSD, 2 x 1GB SATA SSD, 4TB external HDD
    32 GB RAM
    Windows 11 Pro
  • SamuraiSamurai185 Posts: 408Member
    Looks like a superb model. From a scene "accuracy" point of view, the refraction of the running lights (the "star" pattern they're generating) doesn't tie in with the visible DoF in that last shot.

    My suggestion would be to re-examine which elements of the image are blurred. At the moment it looks like it's almost a radial pattern from the bridge of the Klingon ship. Using an aperture that would result in that style of refraction on the lights would normally mean that the vast majority of either of the ships would be in focus, with the other less so- depending on the photographers chosen focal point for the image.

    Of course you might be going for the "miniatures" (or "tilt/shift") look- in which case disregard the above. :D
    "Perfect. Then that's the way it shall be."
  • japetusjapetus2960 SeattlePosts: 1,401Member
    Samurai wrote: »
    Looks like a superb model. From a scene "accuracy" point of view, the refraction of the running lights (the "star" pattern they're generating) doesn't tie in with the visible DoF in that last shot.

    My suggestion would be to re-examine which elements of the image are blurred. At the moment it looks like it's almost a radial pattern from the bridge of the Klingon ship. Using an aperture that would result in that style of refraction on the lights would normally mean that the vast majority of either of the ships would be in focus, with the other less so- depending on the photographers chosen focal point for the image.

    Of course you might be going for the "miniatures" (or "tilt/shift") look- in which case disregard the above. :D

    Well I'm using a zdeph pass to do the depth of field, if that's what you mean by "refraction". I thing what you may be seeing is the chromatic aberration node which I realize now is causing a weird effect, especially in the stars. That part definietely needs a tweak.
  • MartocticvsMartocticvs444 Posts: 524Member
    Looks like she's turned out really well - nice job!
Sign In or Register to comment.