Greetings!

Welcome to Scifi-Meshes.com! Click one of these buttons to join in on the fun.

AnimationMylex' Star Trek projects

123578

Posts

  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    edited January 27 #122
    Thanks all for your advice, this was really helpful.

    Did some tries to the audio, I think this sounds much better

    Post edited by mylex on
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    edited January 27 #123
    Another animation preview

    Post edited by mylex on
  • SchimpfySchimpfy331 Posts: 0Member
    Always excited to see what you're going to show us next! Great work! :)
  • Destructor!!!Destructor!!!0 Posts: 0Member
    Can I suggest an alteration to the computer generated dialogue?

    As others have said "It's not of ours" is an odd way of putting it. "It's not one of ours" would be better.

    Also, "The information is not clear" is another strange way of putting it. "Sensor readings are unclear"

    So, it would go:

    Kirk: What do you make of her?

    Voice: It's not one of ours. Sensor readings are unclear, but it could be a Klingon ship.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    Can I suggest an alteration to the computer generated dialogue?

    As others have said "It's not of ours" is an odd way of putting it. "It's not one of ours" would be better.

    Also, "The information is not clear" is another strange way of putting it. "Sensor readings are unclear"

    So, it would go:

    Kirk: What do you make of her?

    Voice: It's not one of ours. Sensor readings are unclear, but it could be a Klingon ship.

    Thanks

    I fixed "It' not one of ours" but the others don't work with the voice, it sounds really bad because of the pronunciation but I'll try something.
  • rojrenrojren1278 Louisville, Kentucky USAPosts: 1,730Member
    Why are you using a computer generated voice?
    www.CADWrangler.com
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    After some work to the Bird of Prey mesh of WJaspers it's ready for the first shots
    93665.jpg
    bop.jpg 211.1K
  • AresiusAresius353 Posts: 4,162Member
    Apart from the odd dialogue, I've another inconsistency.
    Whent hey depart, Saavik asks for the course and Kirk says "Captains disgression." But later on, he tells Sulu "Warp 5." And Sulus responds with "So much for the training session."
    These two don't match up really...

    Beyond that, great work, I really love it.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    Aresius wrote: »
    Apart from the odd dialogue, I've another inconsistency.
    Whent hey depart, Saavik asks for the course and Kirk says "Captains disgression." But later on, he tells Sulu "Warp 5." And Sulus responds with "So much for the training session."
    These two don't match up really...

    Beyond that, great work, I really love it.

    Thanks

    But why don't match this, in case we forget all what we know about ST TWOK.

    Enterprise leaving spacedock with a starfleet academy crew on a training course. There is no direct order to the heading. Kirk only give the order to warp speed and Sulu affirmed the training cruise. I think this could match with a little bit of imagination. :)
  • AresiusAresius353 Posts: 4,162Member
    Well, that's the thing. He said "Captains disgression." but then gives orders himself. That's the first thing, as he's not a/the captain at that time, Spock is.
    And second, Sulus line clearly points to something not going the way things should go. Not what he says, the way he says it is important. And the facial expression also accounts to that.
  • mattcmattc180 Perth, AuPosts: 321Member
    Aresius wrote: »
    Well, that's the thing. He said "Captains disgression." but then gives orders himself. That's the first thing, as he's not a/the captain at that time, Spock is.
    And second, Sulus line clearly points to something not going the way things should go. Not what he says, the way he says it is important. And the facial expression also accounts to that.

    You mean "Captains' discretion", of course.
  • TALON_UKTALON_UK1 Posts: 0Member
    Yeah, narratively there is a bit of an issue there.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    edited January 27 #134
    First shot with the Bird of Prey, my interpretation of decloaking process


    Watch this in Full HD to see the details of the effect
    Post edited by mylex on
  • TALON_UKTALON_UK1 Posts: 0Member
    Very cool, I think it needs just a touch more shimmer/wobble/ripple or whatever you choose to call it as it moves when cloaked, like the cloaking field is distorting the light that is seen through it. Really looking forward to this next animation.
  • AresiusAresius353 Posts: 4,162Member
    I agree in the shimmer, but it als should be somewhat faster. As I recall, cloaking/decloaking is, when the ship's most vulernable, and that's far too long even for cinematical dramatic standarts.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    edited January 27 #137
    Next animation preview

    Post edited by mylex on
  • Chris2005Chris2005575 Posts: 3,079Member
    For the cloaking effect, I'd use compositing in AE, with the BoP on a separate layer, giving it some kind of ripple effect, keyframing it's strength, or whatever to 0... that's how I did the cloaking effect in my TNG "Defector" VFX video.
    AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
    Gigabyte RTX 3080 Gaming OC 12GB
    240GB SSD, 500GB SSD, 1TB HDD, 4TB external HDD
    32 GB RAM
    Windows 11 Pro
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    Chris2005 wrote: »
    For the cloaking effect, I'd use compositing in AE, with the BoP on a separate layer, giving it some kind of ripple effect, keyframing it's strength, or whatever to 0... that's how I did the cloaking effect in my TNG "Defector" VFX video.

    The cloaking effect has 3 layers, background, mask of the BoP, and the BoP himself, the used effect is a blend effect with a moving iris lens. I think this is working good to make the background a little bit blurred. I'll playing with some clomplex wave effects to generate the ripple effect, must be easy to realize.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    Bird of Prey attacking the Enterprise, Kirk make a mistake and Enterprise is getting two hits
    93810.jpg93811.jpg
  • lexington1709lexington1709339 Posts: 24Member
    "Oops! I knew I was forgetting to do something!" - Kirk

    Seriously, I've been following this on YouTube and if I had half your skill, I'd have it made! Good work, Sir, and am looking forward to seeing how this progresses.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    This is the last CG shot, now I start with the post production and the final sound editing
    93897.jpg
  • SaquistSaquist1 Posts: 0Member
    I'd suggest not making the transition from Warp to impulse just as abrubt as the acceleration jump to warp.
    If you did it like Star Trek VI where the Camera Pans around as the Enterprise comes out of warp it would feel a bit more graceful. Or as the camera pans the warp streaks disappear and the ship passes and then fires torpedoes moving rapidly on impulse....That might make a pretty intense transition scene.
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    edited January 27 #144
    Inspired of MadKoiFish's thread about the TMP pearl effect, I worked on my setup and made a little test render. It's not easy to get this effect right, there are too many parameter to edit. :(

    Post edited by mylex on
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    edited January 27 #145
    Finished the "Attack of the Klingons" video, which is going online the next days.

    Next project is the recreation of the VFX of Star Trek - The Final Frontier

    First part the title

    Post edited by mylex on
  • rojrenrojren1278 Louisville, Kentucky USAPosts: 1,730Member
    (The pearlescent test)

    It looks very pretty, but at about the 15 second mark, the lens flare from the sun, and the pearlescent effect combine on the right-top of the saucer to make a really odd looking reflection.
    www.CADWrangler.com
  • TALON_UKTALON_UK1 Posts: 0Member
    rojren wrote: »
    (The pearlescent test)

    It looks very pretty, but at about the 15 second mark, the lens flare from the sun, and the pearlescent effect combine on the right-top of the saucer to make a really odd looking reflection.

    Not sure what you're talking about there, viewed it in hi rez and could see any issue at that time. The only thing I can see that it might be is the light glare lens effect coming from the sun, which has nothing to do with the pearlescent effect.
  • BasillBasill172 Posts: 0Member
    I think he's just saying that the lens glare effect makes it appear as if there is a weird reflection on the hull's surface that isn't there. I noticed the same thing and had to take a second look (yeah, twist my arm) before I realized it was just lens flare from the sun's glow.
  • rojrenrojren1278 Louisville, Kentucky USAPosts: 1,730Member
    Just saying that with the hull being shiny, the lens flare 'looks' like a reflection on the hull.

    (After zooming around the screen capture, I'm even more impressed with the ship than I was.)
    94031.jpg
    www.CADWrangler.com
  • mylexmylex322 Posts: 226Member
    rojren wrote: »
    Just saying that with the hull being shiny, the lens flare 'looks' like a reflection on the hull.

    (After zooming around the screen capture, I'm even more impressed with the ship than I was.)

    This was just a quick render, the lens flares could be optimized :)
Sign In or Register to comment.