Welcome to! Click one of these buttons to join in on the fun.

This is the fancy new sidebar. It offers quick access to your profile, messages, threads and so on.
Hit the X in the top right corner to dismiss this message.

Welcome to the fancy new! You old username and password should work. If not, get in touch with staff either here, on Facebook or on Discord.

For a quick summary on what's new, check out this thread.
You should also check out the Community Guidelines here.
You can check out most recent posts here or by clicking the handy links on the top menu or the sidebar.

You can dismiss this message by clicking the little X in the top right corner.

U.S.S. Coronado, Katana Class Starship



  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_180532 Posts: 8,149Member
    That looks awesome.

    How do you get those cool glow effects? Is there a node for that? (please don't tell me it's post processing)
  • Vortex5972Vortex597267 Posts: 991Member
    Looking good.
  • McCMcC178 Posts: 647Member
    Thanks, evil_genius_180 and Vortex5972!
    How do you get those cool glow effects? Is there a node for that? (please don't tell me it's post processing)
    It is post-processing, but it's internal to Blender, so it's all just part of the render. Here's the compositing node setup:


    This probably looks super intimidating, but it's actually really straight-forward and the only pieces that really matter to the glow is the Glare node, which I rolled open so you can see the settings.

    Quicky explanation:
    • Add Diffuse Direct and Indirect to each other (makes "Diffuse Light").
    • Add Glossy Direct to a blurred version of Glossy Indirect (helps cut down on Cycles noise; makes "Glossy Light")
    • Add Transmission Direct and Transmission Indirect to each other (makes "Transmission Light")
    • Multiply Diffuse by AO to enhance crevices and such (now "Diffuse+AO")
    • Multiply the Diffuse Color by the Diffuse+AO (makes "Diffuse")
    • Multiply the Glossy Color by the Glossy Light (makes "Glossy")
    • Multiply the Transmission Color by the Transmission Light (makes "Transmission")
    • Add Emit to Transmission (makes "Luminous")
    • Add Diffuse and Glossy (makes "Lit" or "Non-Luminous" or whatever you want to call it)
    • Plug Luminous into Glare so that only the lit-up things glow (makes "Glow")
    • Add Glow to Non-Luminous to get Composite A
    • (Optional) Plug Composite A into Lens Distortion to get some subtle chromatic aberration and use the output of this as your final composite.

    A lot of components, but splitting them out like that gives you tons of control.
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_180532 Posts: 8,149Member
    OK, thanks. I'll have to give that a try sometime. :)
  • McCMcC178 Posts: 647Member
    I'm still here! :D

    Finally got up enough steam to get back to work on this lady here and found myself floundering as to what I had last been planning to do. While aimlessly spinning the model around, trying to decide what to tackle next, I noticed a really ugly distortion on the secondary hull, a bit aft of the deflector. Some kind of weird bulge or pucker had formed in the hull panels there, probably due to a minor distortion in the underlying cage mesh that compounded as I built the panels up on top of it.

    Thus began many hours of manual tear-down and rebuild of the affected polygons, making liberal use of LoopTools > Curve and Faces > Grid Fill to reconstruct corrected geometry and re-create the area by hand. I also used this as an opportunity to clean up the blend of the torpedo "nose" delta into the surrounding hull, which had been pretty gnarly before, even if it looked okay.

    Here are a pair of before/after OpenGL viewport captures showing the old geometry and the rebuilt new geometry.

    The above turned into an animated gif:

    Here's the same area from a slightly different angle, showing the area free of distortion as the specular highlight falls across it.

    Now to decide what comes next...
  • Vortex5972Vortex597267 Posts: 991Member
    Woo! Good to see you back at it.

    Looking forward to what comes next.
  • publiusrpubliusr227 Posts: 1,167Member
    This is one of Sternbach's idea for the NOVA. I think--in the opening of Voyager--a full Federation starship--and not just a Raider--was going to be the Val Jean
  • StarscreamStarscream229 Posts: 1,049Member
    publiusr wrote: »
    This is one of Sternbach's idea for the NOVA. I think--in the opening of Voyager--a full Federation starship--and not just a Raider--was going to be the Val Jean

    Specifically, it originates from the old Nova-class concepts in the TNG Technical Manual, postulating what a future Enterprise-E might have looked like. The more angular of those four concepts probably informed the subsequent Defiant Pathfinder design in the DS9 TM, which in turn was modified into the actual Nova-class USS Equinox for Voyager.

    (Shame, I always preferred the name 'Nova' over Sovereign, which to me seems rather backwards for an interstellar republic. But whatever.)

    Not sure what any of those concepts has to do with the Val Jean though; and there's no record of any full size Starship designs being intended for Caretaker (and it's not really to be expected that the Maquis would be able to fuel and run and full-sized vessel anyway, surely!)
  • McCMcC178 Posts: 647Member
    If you're just joining this thread, hi! Please read the first post for some background info. Many questions have come up over and over again that are answered there. Thanks!

    Well. It's been a minute, hasn't it? :D

    It's been a struggle to muster up the energy to work on Coro for the last long while because every time I've opened her I've been faced with the prospect of rebuilding a bunch of too-low-res hull panels on the stardrive. The issue I talked about in my last post turned out to be just the tip of the iceberg. I couldn't progress with detailing there at all until I slogged through rebuilding that section...which I finally have!

    Here's an in-progress open GL shot of what I'm referring to:

    The stardrive after finishing the rebuild (sadly, the differences are practically invisible at this distance):

    But with that done, I could finally start in on the windows (and the rooms behind them) that I first mocked up back in February after posting my last update. Powered through those all day today.

    Now I can finally move on to some actual hull detailing, after all this time! :D
    My goal is to have the model render-complete by the end of August, 2014.
    Ah, the naivete of early project enthusiasm. :rolleyes:
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_180532 Posts: 8,149Member
    It's good to see you back and that you're still working on this. :)

    Wow, that looks like a big undertaking, redoing all of those panels. I probably would have just started over and been nowhere near as far along as you are. :shiner:
  • Vortex5972Vortex597267 Posts: 991Member
    Whoa! Nice to see you still at it.
  • McCMcC178 Posts: 647Member
    If you're just joining this thread, hi! Please read the first post for some background info. Many questions have come up over and over again that are answered there. Thanks!

    Thanks, evil_genius_180 and Vortext5972! :D

    Decided to reduce the window count on the stardrive a bit after looking at it from various angles. The below renders aren't exciting; just self-illumination-only to show the revised/reduced window layout.
    coro_2017-09-05-1435.jpg coro_2017-09-05-1440.jpg

    Also added a little shuttle observation/control room at the end of the spine.

    Finally, been hard at work on the ventral "notch"/fantail and the underside of the pylons. This includes a very quick color-only overlay texture UV projected from a plane placed beneath the fantail geometry. I got fed up with how bland it was looking without the intended variations in hull panel coloring, so I took a screenshot of the bottom side of the model and then just painted over it. Throwaway work, but it made me feel better. :D


    I think I need to rebuild the trailing edge of the fantail; seeing segmentation there, too. That, at least, shouldn't be nearly as nasty to rebuild as the hull panels were.
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_180532 Posts: 8,149Member
    That's looking fantastic, bro. I like the reduced windows. Some Trek ships have too many for my taste.
  • RekkertRekkert407 Buenos Aires, ArgentinaPosts: 1,603Member
    Very nice progress! I looove self illumination only renders. :D
    For my finished Trek bridges and other works of mine, visit my portfolio
    Feel free to contact me if you're interested in commissions!​
  • McCMcC178 Posts: 647Member
    If you're just joining this thread, hi! Please read the first post for some background info. Many questions have come up over and over again that are answered there. Thanks!

    Still slowly plinking away on this. :)

    Updates from September 2017

    I did a few more things in September since my last post before putting the model down entirely for a while. As mentioned, I did indeed end up rebuilding the trailing edge of the fantail (and also tossed down some stand-in shuttle landing markers for fun!), as well as adding some more surface detail to the underside of it.

    coro_2017-09-08-1218.jpg coro_2017-09-08-1656.jpg coro_2017-09-08-2316.jpg

    I also added an arboretum just above the aft shuttlebay.

    coro_2017-09-09-2104.jpg coro_2017-09-09-2110.jpg

    Pretty happy with the state of the hull, it was time to turn my attention to the nacelles. Oh, the nacelles. How little did I realize these would plague me!

    First, I mocked up the bits I wanted to steal from the Sovereign nacelles and what I wanted to change.


    Several weeks of fiddling, tweaking, rebuilding, tweaking some more, rebuilding again got me here (apologies for the poor render quality):


    And then...I kind of went dormant for a while.

    Fast-forward: July 2018 to present

    After 9.5 months of very infrequent tweaking, I made it this much further:


    Wow, such progress :rolleyes:

    But also around this time, I started fooling around with Blender's viewport matcap stuff. Applying a bright, cherry-colored car shader to the whole model, I started seeing just how bad the geometry underlying the nacelle was. A whole lot of time went into taking the nacelle cap from what you see on the left to what you see on the right (or top/bottom, depending on your browser, I guess!):

    coro_2018-07-17-1906_matcap.jpg coro_2018-07-18-1209_matcap.jpg

    Now heavily afflicted with matcapitis, I started obsessing over correcting my nacelle topology and spent days and days and days tweaking and rebuilding them.


    The resulting nacelle:

    coro_2018-08-02-1743.jpg coro_2018-08-02-1755.jpg coro_2018-08-03-2205.jpg

    Next, I turned my attention to that aft shuttlebay. I had originally planned to do an Intrepid-style vertical big door, but throughout the life of the roleplaying game, we had always conceived of (and my previous models had featured) that aft bay being a curved, overlapping warped clamshell door, like the Sovereign or Excelsior.

    I knew from screwing around with (and eventually abandoning, in favor of a refit Constitution-style) such doors on my Ambassador, though, that they didn't really "work" from a mechanical point of view. Not in the graceful way that a true hemispherical clamshell does, as found on the original Constitution, but a strict clamshell just didn't look right on this ship. An angled-slats-on-tracks (a la Constitution refit and my Ambassador solution) wouldn't look right on this ship, either. What to do?

    I ended up trying a whole mess of concepts. (These are webp images, converted from animated gifs; I originally tried to embed them as much-much-much smaller mp4s, but neither the video nor img tags seem to support mp4. The mp4s are about 1/3 as large as the webp images, which themselves are about 1/4 the size of the gifs!)

    Excelsior-style, individual slat retraction. Consumes a lot of interior volume for slat storage.

    Excelsior-style, single door hinge with slat-to-slat hinges to allow curvature matching to the hull. Requires less interior storage, but still a lot.

    Sovereign-style, multi-depth layered clamshell with "cheated" pivot points.

    Similar to above, but with the "bottom" of the clamshell wedges constrained to follow a consistent curve. Pivot points are obviously all over the place.

    Excelsior-style, splitting in half and following the upper bay contour, but allowing the slats to "sink" into the hull. Interesting byproduct where the slats stuck into the hull also follow a pretty consistent curvature, which makes this kind of promising. That they stick out of the bottom isn't as big an issue as it seems, since they can be retracted up into the hull a fair amount to avoid this. The downside is that, in profile, these straight slats don't look consistent with the curves of the rest of the ship.

    ST'09-style "Delta" doors, opening in the best way I can figure that they'd open, based on their appearance in both open and closed positions. I mostly did this as a gag, but the idea of the door having a oouple of major parts, each which retract into the hull in their own way, has some merit. But why would you ever build a door like this, anyway?

    That's where things stand as of right now. I still haven't solved the bay door issue and I want to find a feasible mechanical solution that also looks good and befits the ship.
  • SchimpfySchimpfy171 Posts: 0Member
    I think your delta door layout shows the most promise. it's visually interesting and from an engineering standpoint it seems to be the simplest yet functional design.
  • McCMcC178 Posts: 647Member
    If you're just joining this thread, hi! Please read the first post for some background info. Many questions have come up over and over again that are answered there. Thanks!

    Been a minute, hasn't it? :sweat_smile:

    I haven't done much on this since October, but I did end up solving the bay doors in a way I was satisfied with, and then started in on the shuttlebay interior. I've returned to lurking ever since the forum revamp and doing so has gradually ratcheted up the desire to get back into the mix of things, despite the craziness of my schedule these days--currently running four D&D campaigns, including a game for my coworkers, as well as playing in a campaign my wife is running; my wife and I have also taken up indoor rock climbing and try to make it to the rock gym three times a week if we can. Doesn't leave a lot of time for modeling :grimace:


    Still unhappy with any of my bay door solutions above, I started looking outside the box I'd put myself in for completely alternate solutions. One of the old Coro RPers suggested looking to the Luna-class for inspiration, which has a more conventional spherical clamshell door (and thus doesn't have the mechanical issues that non-spherical doors do), but nestled inside some long hull extrusions. Combining this idea with the fantail of the Intrepid-class that had formed the original basis of the ship's aft bay, I ended up with something I rather liked:

    coro_2018-09-03-1440_ogl.jpg coro_2018-09-03-1441_ogl.jpg coro_2018-09-03-1442_ogl.jpg

    Test animation to verify the doors fit/open nicely:

    Here's what she looks like when dressed up for the camera (still with only temporary textures, though):


    Cool! Finally time to move on--or rather, in!

    coro_2018-10-13-2234.jpg coro_2018-10-14-1222.jpg coro_2018-10-14-1456.jpg coro_2018-10-14-1938.jpg coro_2018-10-20-1520.jpg

    For the shuttlebay, I'm taking a lot of design cues from the Intrepid-class bay interiors, while retaining some of the design elements I used on my Ambassador, despite pretty wide technological gulfs between the ships. I figure a shuttle tractor beam is a shuttle tractor beam is a shuttle tractor beam. :grin: The overall bay layout comes from some 2D floorplan work one of the Coro RPers did back in the day, slightly adapted to fit the hull shape of this model.

    I also started messing around with Blender's filmic rendering and redid a bunch of shaders.


    I'm not sure if any of the things that went into this image are actually all that noticeable (other than "it's darker/shinier" or similar), but the above represents the following:
    • Switching from standard to filmic rendering, dramatically expanding the range of virtual f-stops
    • Redid the underlying shaders so that every single piece of hull/metal shares a single "hull shader" master node, which uses Principled BDSF at its heart.
    • Cooked up a shader for the running lights that will automatically color them red/green/white based on where they are relative to the centerline of the model.

    Another angle, with an older render for comparison.


    None of the shader settings are final, and the textures continue to just be quick idea mock-ups, nothing remotely final.

    Sadly, I haven't done much since then, though. Hopefully will find some time to get back to it soon!
    • Like - Lizzy777 on June 6, 2019.
    • Like - Rekkert on June 7, 2019.
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_180532 Posts: 8,149Member
    It's nice to see you are/were still working on this. (it's still an ongoing WIP) I like your solution for the bay doors. Clamshells are the best.
  • RekkertRekkert407 Buenos Aires, ArgentinaPosts: 1,603Member
    edited June 7 #140
    Very cool update, the changes on the shaders make the ship look even better than it did before.
    Post edited by Rekkert on
    For my finished Trek bridges and other works of mine, visit my portfolio
    Feel free to contact me if you're interested in commissions!​
Sign In or Register to comment.