Greetings!

Welcome to Scifi-Meshes.com! Click one of these buttons to join in on the fun.

Thylacene Star Destroyer

[Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
thylacene1024.jpg
Here's something I made several months ago, but never got around to rendering properly until today. My own design, built from scratch in Cinema 4D, some post-work in Photoshop.

The concept is that after the Empire's defeat at Endor, they found that their shipyards were producing more fighters than their fleet could support. Thus several partially completed ISDs were converted into makeshift carriers.
Tagged:

Posts

  • Andrew MarchAndrew March0 Posts: 0Member
    Looks abit too much like a kitbash for my tastes
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    But it's *not* a kitbash, I spent countless hours modelling this, and everything in this image is my own creation. I'd appreciate some more constructive criticism, please.
  • kuckuk333kuckuk333178 Posts: 209Member
    the tube-like things at port and starbord look a bit strange, are they supposed to be weaponsystems? and why is the front of that ship devided? the background looks well and the relationship with ISD can't be denied.
  • Halo BuffHalo Buff331 Posts: 0Member
    Looks like the ship is divided to make room for the hangerbays for the fighters, as it is a carrier, as told by his caption,
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    Aye, the centre of the SD has been hollowed out to make way for massive hangers. The 'tubes' on the side are supposed to be emergency landing bays, to avoid congestion in the main bays.
  • Andrew MarchAndrew March0 Posts: 0Member
    It might not be a kitbash but that's what it looks like to me.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    Andrew, the whole point of this project for me was to make something which looks like a modified ISD - yet I gather that you don't like it because it looks like a modified ISD. If someone posts a picture of a flower and asks for feedback, saying "I don't like flowers" is counter-productive. Your comment was unhelpful, and a little hurtful.





    What do you think of the level of detail? The quality of the render? The overall composition? The background? The concept? Stop sniping, and help me become a better artist, please.
  • Andrew MarchAndrew March0 Posts: 0Member
    theleast, you're right sorry about that, okay.





    I'd lose the photo background and create something higher res, right now it looks like a model slapped on a low res photo background.





    I'd tone down the panels texture so it isn't so obvious, the ISD by fractalsponge has so much detail it hasn't actually got any textures at all but your textures are drowning out the details on the model.





    Lastly i'd work on the lighting and angle of the ship, even though we know how big a star destroyer is there's nothing in this image that conveys a sense of scale. A more dynamic lighting setup will also greatly improve the menacing mood that a ship like this should give.





    Hope that helps a bit
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    Andrew,





    Thankyou, that's much more helpful. I'm sorry if I was a bit snotty earlier - I was in a bad mood yesterday.





    "Photo background"? I made that nebula myself :P





    I'll give some thought to the texture and composition, though I thought the panel texture was quite subtle already.
  • SandmanNinjaSandmanNinja0 Posts: 0Member
    Cool model!





    Maybe have a squadron of tie-fighters flying escort? A ship of the line always has a CAP (Combat Air Patrol) of some sort, and it would help with the scale, too.
  • Fafnir_6Fafnir_6171 Posts: 0Member
    I like the idea of this design. Unfortunately, I lack the 3D modelling skills to critique those aspects of the picture but the starship design is great.
  • firekitefirekite0 Posts: 0Member
    so which would be the better carrier, these or the venator class? do you have any specs for her?
  • gthompsngthompsn171 Posts: 0Member
    I look forward to seeing more of this...
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    I recomend removing the square emergency landing bays. I like the idea, but the square tubes look strange, out of place, and clunky.


    I suggest integrating the tubes into the hull in a way that isn't so clandestine.


    Have the tubes directly a part of the hull and not things "stuck on".





    Besides that, the ship looks very nice and well concieved. Very nicely done.
  • cooloneinca 2224cooloneinca 22240 Posts: 0Member
    Love the ship cool awsome awmazing pardon my french
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    Cool. Reminds me of the Gladiator-class star destroyer. :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member
    Sweet, I'm a carrier fan myself. got any tips?
Sign In or Register to comment.