Sincerity On the Approach

Posts

• Jenny2 Posts: 0Member

  October 2007 #2

  The starships 'parked' on the office pods look odd... after all, isn't that what the docking arm is for?
• Hobbes5 Posts: 0Member

  October 2007 #3

  

  Nice, did you forget to credit for the space station?
• Andrew331 Posts: 0Member

  October 2007 #4

  

  Nice. Would look better if there was some motion blur and depth of field.
• [Deleted User]11 Posts: 4,002Member

  October 2007 #5

  It's an okay looking image.
• Andrew March0 Posts: 0Member

  October 2007 #6

  Some major problems with scale going on here.
  
  
  
  
  
  Take a look at the windows on those pads (which by the way are astronomical observation platforms, not landing pads), the windows are bigger than the whole of deck 1 on the galaxy class.
  
  
  
  
  
  Same goes with the docking port on the station, way too big.
• newcmd0010 Posts: 0Member

  October 2007 #7

  Hobbes: Thank you for pointing out! Corrected. (Pending approval, of course.)
  
  
  
  
  
  Walkyrie, Andrew M: I looked to [URL="http://www.ditl.org"]DITL[/URL] for reference, so the station is to scale, by realistic speculation, although yes, on-screen the station fit the Defiant quite just nicely. The docking port is still not big enough to fit the Nebula-class, however. (Actually went back to MAX to double-check.) The interpretation that the pads are for landing are not the best possible, so thanks for pointing out. Will avoid that next time.
• captainkirk171 Posts: 0Member

  November 2007 #8

  

  Not a bad image, it looks a lot like one I did. The angle is the same too.
• Excalibur0010 Posts: 0Member

  September 2008 #9

  I Like the Akira class, but the warp nacelles look like an after thought