Background info:
The Legacy project, which began in the early 2370's, arose from Starfleet's need to expand on the capabilities of the Galaxy class explorer. Whilst the project was put on hold in favour of warship production during the Dominion War, it was reinstated upon the war's end in 2375. Whilst the Galaxy class was at the height of it's production run, many considered the design to have several inherent weaknesses that could only be fully addressed with a new class of ship. The Legacy would aim to improve upon the apparently high attrition rate of the Galaxy class and other vessels on deep space missions.
It had been noticed that the Galaxy class had a comparatively fragile space frame for a vessel of it's size. In fact, once it's shields were negated, vessels of this class would often have a matter of minutes before their warp cores went critical. Two famous examples of such calamities were the fates of the USS Odyssey and the Enterprise-D. As such, the Legacy class focused on durability above all else. As the ship was primarily an explorer and not a warship (like the Sovereign class) it's weapons would be limited to type XI phasers and photon torpedoes. As ablative armour was too costly and complicated to cover the entire vessel with, a new technique in manufacturing hull plating was employed that incorporated layers of carbon-neutronium alloy. These were intended to increase the ship's survivability rate even in the event of total shield failure.
Durability was also a key element in the ships overall design geometry. The main components of saucer and secondary hull were brought closer together and the pylons connecting the warp nacelles were made thicker and actually intersected the nacelles themselves, providing the ship with it's unique 'winged' profile and a useful platform for extra phaser emplacements.
Whilst this feature slightly decreased the overall stability of the warp field (by partially covering the nacelle field grilles), it also offered an increased degree of protection from enemy fire.
Another notable design feature was the removal of the ship's ability to separate it's saucer from its engineering section. For the Galaxy class, this was envisaged as a means of maintaining the majority of non-combatants safe in the saucer section, while using the stardrive section to enter hostile situations. However, its utility was vastly outweighed by keeping the ship A‘whole,A’ as demonstrated by the lack of separation in the majority of risky or dangerous situations encounted by the Galaxy classes. Essentially, instead of having two ships that could operate independently, the ship actually created a capable, but weakened stardrive section (that lacked redundancy, such as impulse drive or additional transporter rooms) while simultaneously providing a huge liability in the need to defend the saucer. Overall, the removal of this feature gave the Legacy a much sturdier design which meant that it's structural integrity field required half as much energy as its Galaxy class counterpart.
With these modifications, Starfleeet hopes to create a starship that would be able to endure long range missions without the need of regular maintainence from a starbase. In fact, one of the primary missions of the Legacy would be to reinstate exploration of the furthest reaches of the Gamma quadrant, beyond the borders of the Dominion.
USS LEGACY 3.jpg
USS LEGACY 5.jpg
USS LEGACY 6.jpg
USS LEGACY 4.jpg
USS LEGACY docked at DS9.jpg
Posts
^^ Heheh, yeah, what he said.
The best I can do is address the issue of the struts intersecting through the glass area or warp nacelle grille, if you prefer. The newer 'Mk II' nacelle has the grille more moulded around the strut. If you look closely at the port side elevation of this Haynes style set of orthos I've done, you can see what I mean. I'm currently waiting for another render to finish that'll better illustrate this modification.
The model epic....
I don't know whether to be insulted or pleased with that comment....so I'll be a little of both. THIS is an ugly ship: Exploration_Cruiser_Refit.png My ship is not ugly...or THAT ugly, at least....
Your ship (aka model) looks good for it's creation. It's just the inherent design that's ugly.
Well I guess that beauty really is in the eye of the beholder.
star-trek-online-SPACEDOCK-TREKYARDS-JPG.jpg
Good workaround Simon! :thumb:
Like this design though, the pylon/winglet seems like a practical feature