Greetings!

Welcome to Scifi-Meshes.com! Click one of these buttons to join in on the fun.

3DStar Wars - X-Wing revisited

2»

Posts

  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    I have made an Ortho of the fuselage so you can see all details.

    x-wing-revisited-019.jpg

    More soon :)

    Chris
    92136.jpg
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    Hi all,

    I'm done with the engines:

    x-wing-revisited-021.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-022.jpg

    I'm now starting with the details on the wings.

    I hope you like it ... more to come soon :)

    Chris
    92232.jpg92233.jpg
  • anystaranystar0 Posts: 0Member
    beautiful as always!
    i may have to move my own x-wing back closer to the top of my to-do list :)
  • WizWiz28 Posts: 0Member
    She's a beaut mate! coming along very nicely! :)
  • kippakippa0 Posts: 0Member
    Amazing attention to detail. :)
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_1804256 Posts: 11,034Member
    I agree with the others, it looks fantastic. If we aren't already calling you this, we need to call you the resident X-wing expert. :)
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    Hi all,

    after I got some new reference material I have modified the Fuselage to look more accurate. Besiede that I put in more details.

    Here are some render:
    x-wing-revisited-024.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-027.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-026.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-025.jpg

    She looks more complete now but still a lot of details left to do.

    I hope you like it ... more to come soon :)

    Chris
    92570.jpg92571.jpg92572.jpg92573.jpg
  • stonkystonky350 Posts: 489Member
    Great stuff! I love the X-Wing, one of my all tie favorites! Are you doing any specific ship (Red 1,2,3 etc.)?
  • DCBDCB331 Posts: 0Member
    Red 5 (Luke) wasn't it?
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    stonky wrote: »
    Great stuff! I love the X-Wing, one of my all tie favorites! Are you doing any specific ship (Red 1,2,3 etc.)?
    DCB wrote: »
    Red 5 (Luke) wasn't it?

    I'll do Red 1, Red 3 and Red 5. Red 2 is completely different to the three others. AFAIK Red2 was Blue 1 first. It was the very first X-Wing in that form we have seen in the movies. Red 2 has much differences in fuselage and in alot of details. So I decided its easier to make 3 out of 1. 1,3,5 are looking very equal, only different in some details.
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_1804256 Posts: 11,034Member
    That's looking outstanding. Don't you love it when you find more references that help you make your model even more accurate? :)
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    That's looking outstanding. Don't you love it when you find more references that help you make your model even more accurate? :)

    yesss! :D
  • Darth ZiggyDarth Ziggy0 Posts: 0Member
    Outstanding!
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    Hi all, thank you for the nice comments.

    here is an update. I have made some more details and put together a Red 5.

    x-wing-revisited-028.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-029.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-030.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-031.jpg

    x-wing-revisited-032.jpg

    Some more details are left to do. I hope you like it

    More soon

    Chris
    92626.jpg92627.jpg92628.jpg92629.jpg92630.jpg
  • kippakippa0 Posts: 0Member
    Great work as ever. How many polys are in this model now?
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    it has about 1 million polys right now
  • evil_genius_180evil_genius_1804256 Posts: 11,034Member
    I'm loving it. Great work, as usual. :D
  • stonkystonky350 Posts: 489Member
    It's looking great, as always!

    On of the things that you might want to look into is the angle of the open wings - for years it was believed that each wing opened to 15 degrees on the flat inner edge for a combined 30 degrees of spread. 16 degrees is more commonly held now as the open angle upon reviewing all of the reference material available to us today.

    I hope you don't mind, but I made a picture demonstrating 16 degrees of spread for a combined 32 degrees (try to ignore the fact that i simply mirrored the wings, which breaks the interlocking detailing obviously):

    attachment.php?attachmentid=93955&stc=1&d=1324316987

    The truth of the matter is that each model had a slightly different open angle, and that some of the AMT kits from the 70s and 80s actually made it into ROTJ as well, but I guess that it's 1/24 hero's that we pour over most: Red 5 (later Red 4), Red 3, etc. And maybe you're matching one of the X-Wings that didn't open it's wings quite as wide, and if so, just ignore me. :)

    Great stuff, looking forward to seeing more!
  • ChrisGFXChrisGFX362 GermanyPosts: 607Member
    stonky wrote: »
    It's looking great, as always!

    On of the things that you might want to look into is the angle of the open wings - for years it was believed that each wing opened to 15 degrees on the flat inner edge for a combined 30 degrees of spread. 16 degrees is more commonly held now as the open angle upon reviewing all of the reference material available to us today.

    I hope you don't mind, but I made a picture demonstrating 16 degrees of spread for a combined 32 degrees (try to ignore the fact that i simply mirrored the wings, which breaks the interlocking detailing obviously):

    attachment.php?attachmentid=93955&stc=1&d=1324316987

    The truth of the matter is that each model had a slightly different open angle, and that some of the AMT kits from the 70s and 80s actually made it into ROTJ as well, but I guess that it's 1/24 hero's that we pour over most: Red 5 (later Red 4), Red 3, etc. And maybe you're matching one of the X-Wings that didn't open it's wings quite as wide, and if so, just ignore me. :)

    Great stuff, looking forward to seeing more!

    hey Terry, thank you very much for your explanations. I never new that. As you I was believed its 15A° but I will change it to 16A° now.

    Yes, I'm on the finish line now. Some more details need to be done and the modeling is done (for the Red 5). Then I have to manage the UV mapping which is a pain in the butt :)

    again, thank you all for you nice comments, I really appreciate it.
  • psCargilepsCargile417 Posts: 620Member
    If we want to approach the T-65 as an actual vehicle, then manufacturing and maintenance tolerances would give a margin of how much the foils separate. There would be a physical stop--that could be set at 16 degrees--with maybe a 3 to 4 degree margin. In such speculation, not all X-wings would have the same degree of foil spreading.
  • TralfazTralfaz412 Posts: 846Member
    Hey Chris,

    You are truly a master modeler. Beautiful work as always.

    Al
  • stonkystonky350 Posts: 489Member
    Agreed. :)
  • WizWiz28 Posts: 0Member
    Seconded :)
  • Greeble_GremlinGreeble_Gremlin331 Posts: 0Member
    Well, it's been quite a while since I've been to this forum,
    I've really missed out.

    Kudos! on your most excellent X-wing.
    This has got to be one of the best treatments on this subject that I have seen, truly a labor of Love
    (hope you're not getting tired of hearing praises).

    Just curious, are you modeling from the the original styrene Kit parts for your greebles/nurnies?
    I think you really "nailed" the fuselage shape & proportions(not easily done)...Nice work!
    It does have the look & feel of the hero miniatures.

    Can we see a solid-wire-frame render?
    -just to see what a million+ Poly X-wing looks like "under the hood" ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.