Greetings!

Welcome to Scifi-Meshes.com! Click one of these buttons to join in on the fun.

3DApollo Class

13»

Posts

  • StarshipStarship295 São Paulo - BrasilPosts: 1,858Member
    New naceles installed.
    Just the bridge and neck left. After that, will be the time to add details.

    4idr5exs35cn.jpg
    f81l5ybf3r7i.jpg
    mdvkurb0o36x.jpg

    Lizzy777
  • count23count23271 Posts: 700Member
    Nice job, but i think your nacelles are a little too boxy, aren't they? Aren't ambassador style nacelles a little more rounded top and bottom?
    Formerly Nadesico.

    Current Projects:
    Ambassador Class
  • BolianAdmiralBolianAdmiral749 Torrance, CaliforniaPosts: 2,178Member
    edited November 2020 #64
    I really like this... I may just have to kitbash one of these someday, lol.
    Post edited by BolianAdmiral on
  • StarshipStarship295 São Paulo - BrasilPosts: 1,858Member
    Well, after to see the pic of the unused concept pod for the nebula class posted by 137th Gebirg over Trekbbs forums, I´m thinking about a sister to the NCC-10570 - USS Apollo. Why not the NCC-10575 - USS Artemis? The sister will have a pod based upon that unused concept, and a "cave" in the secondary hull, like the Excelsior.
    What do you think?
    10575-1.jpg
    10575-2.jpg
    3mzy3zdrkb1i.jpg


    Lizzy777Freak
  • count23count23271 Posts: 700Member
    Heh, you had the same idea I did, I was going to kitbash up my ambassador to be a nebula type (not apollo as there's too many design choices in Peterson's one that i disagree with), but i was going to use the Nebula concept pod as my ship's pod.

    Looks good though, hehe. But i personally would tweak the torpedo module to look a _little_ less kitbashy. Maybe chop the round part off at the bottom and have it flat and flush with the mount instead.
    Formerly Nadesico.

    Current Projects:
    Ambassador Class
  • StarshipStarship295 São Paulo - BrasilPosts: 1,858Member
    Well, I´m not satisfied with the pod for the Artemis variant, so I tryed two other configurations.
    I´m not totally happy yet...
    9a03et8k2kc7.jpg
    vr9sj7jbfqry.jpg

    Lizzy777
  • StarshipStarship295 São Paulo - BrasilPosts: 1,858Member
    edited January 1 #68
    Ok. let´s try again. I made 7 different pod versions for the Apollo class Artemis variant. I think the Akira pod, better integrated to the main pylon, is the one that works better. Opinions?
    ojd40el902dt.jpg
    wggtxxerkjz5.jpg
    j68ryelycomy.jpg
    98sidu194al4.jpg
    jztvt9adb8nq.jpg
    eo63ng7m3j5n.jpg
    2yyc5sa3bfve.jpg







    Post edited by Starship on
    Lizzy777
  • BolianAdmiralBolianAdmiral749 Torrance, CaliforniaPosts: 2,178Member
    The Akira-like one, and the one with the twin megaphasers look best, IMO, but yeah, I’m not sold on the new pod.
  • StarshipStarship295 São Paulo - BrasilPosts: 1,858Member
    After some help and guindance from Viper and Count23, I improved the geometry of the secondary hull.
    It´s time to focus in other parts of the Apollo class.
    oqndbhzrufja.jpg
    62irf12sve0m.jpg
    65a6vsq75bcz.jpg
    46irhw3ev9rh.jpg
    count23BolianAdmiralMcCLoopholeLizzy777Freak
Sign In or Register to comment.